Pages

Monday, June 3, 2013

1980 Invernizzi Competizione







Hey look. A peanut!

The automatic response to discovering such a delightful and unexpected tidbit would be to put it in your mouth. Especially if you wake up to find aforementioned tidbit resting in your navel. But, assuming you have made some cognitive advancement beyond the age of two, you might then ponder whether or not the last item you ate had any peanuts in it. Then possibly wonder just how long it’s been there. Or whether it is indeed a peanut. But by then it is just a little too late.

Some would say that those older than two should probably have processed that well before putting said item into mouth. 

Those people would be grownups. 



It’s my birthday.



There are advantages to being a grownup. You get to do (more) stuff without asking for permission. Other grownups (usually) pay attention to what you have to say. You get to stay up late(r). You get to drink coffee. And alcohol. And advancing years brings a strength of character to hold off a couple of weeks before watching ‘Iron Man 3’ (thereby avoiding the crowds and nabbing that perfect seat: middle of the front section, knees on the seat rest in front, nape of neck in the crook of the seat, gazing upwards at an enfolding panorama).. expectation and ensuing disappointment aside.

But there are also downsides to being a grownup. You are expected to abide by social conventions. Like not wearing a Jedi Knight outfit to work (or at least leaving your ‘Kill Bill’ Hattori Hanzo replica sword sheathed at home). You have to talk to other grownups about stuff that really doesn’t interest you. You don’t get enough sleep. You need coffee. And alcohol. Other grownups cajole and bully you to sit with them at the back of the cinema. And then, when you eventually get there, Iron Man gets all lovey-dovey then loses what’s left of his mojo over an alien invasion that happened years ago.. Oh c’mon.



Smurfs.

And the Invernizzi Competizione.

For every bicycle brand you know about there’s another thousand or so that you don’t.



There is a difference between the grownup and the adult. Adults are humans that have reached a certain age and legal identity. Grownups are that subgroup of adults who think they have, well, ‘grown up’. They are adults that think they can tell the difference between reality and make-believe. They measure and calculate everything. They need purpose. And validation. They need an explanation for stuff that happens. They are pragmatic. They are reasonable. And they don’t believe in magic.

I know. Because, for 14 hours a day, I am one of them.



Bicycle for a grownup.

No doubt a chap of pleasant disposition and appearance.

Confident and well-informed but diplomatic and always on the right side of history.

A chap one may meet and remember favourably.

Hubba.. hubba..




Without grownups we wouldn’t have the likes of Marie Curie, Thomas Aquinas, Hillary Clinton, or Sophie Scholl. There would would be no rules, no social structure, no culture, no education, no advancement in science, technology, industry or the arts, no common ground to engage with others who see things in a different way. Bullies would rampage unchecked. Things wouldn’t get done. There would be no establishments and no one seeking to change them. There would be no workers. No government. No one to pay tax and no one to redistribute it. 

There’s another thing about grownups: grownups don’t collect bicycles. 

Because bicycle collecting is a ridiculous endeavour. The bicycle is a cheap, utilitarian mode of transport. And there are hundreds of millions of them of all shapes and sizes. Even if you choose to hone in on a few specific brands/types/materials/manufacturing techniques/years/period/size/colour/or component selection in a desperate bid to satisfy whatever simmering psychological issues you harbour you can never hope to control or complete a bicycle collection. In any area. Ever. And if you are collecting bicycles to make money you are misguided or have little or no understanding of investment opportunities. Or your psychological scars run deep and you are completely deluded. If you are collecting to impress then I have crushing news: hot - chicks - don’t - dig - bicycles (or poor people). Bicycles, when not in motion, are awkward and unwieldy. They (usually) don’t stand up on their own and you can’t (easily) chuck them in a drawer or stack them away on a shelf.




I’m mostly grown up now. 

I now know that when a girl says “I think your bum is bigger than mine.” that it’s the same as saying “do you think my bum looks big?”. It means that she is vulnerable and that she is looking for kind words and affection. You don’t say “nooo waaay..” then get out a tape measure to show her the difference. 

I’ve stopped collecting Smurfs.

Yet continue to collect bicycles.



Bet she doesn’t dig bicycles.




1980 and a mix of Nuovo and Super Record.

A time before exa’s, ultras, hypers and ultimates. When “super” was the height of a superlative.

Campagnolo Super Record.



Selle Royal Super Contour.





And another thing: the Tony Stark I know does not bed Pepper Potts. That would just ruin the delicate sexual tension between them. And Tony Stark does not fight inner demons. If memory serves me the super-rich, mega-smart playboy with a fantastic array of toys and a dark, complex personality is a flying rodent from the DC Universe. Not Iron Man. Over the last few weeks many newcomers, young and old, drew their first impression of The Mandarin from Ben Kingsley’s portrayal of him in ‘Iron Man 3’. Just as some of the more mature amongst us drew their first impression of that plucky, little revolutionary from Mr Kingsley’s portrayal of him in ‘Gandhi’ (1982). Only the latter bears any resemblance to the original. 

Some might say that the former doesn’t really matter because he’s fictional.

Those people would be grownups. 

The notion that an accurate record of the real world is more important than that of an imaginary one certainly has merit. History should be accurate. And fiction need not be so finicky. But one does not exclude the other. The retelling of stories, real or imagined, is a uniquely human experience - with all its flaws, adjustments, embellishments and inaccuracies. By drawing from real and imagined worlds we sink roots in a physical presence that moves constantly around us. Stories serve as reference points for how we relate and respond to the real world. And their importance cannot be underestimated. It can be argued that many bad things come from careless or misguided narratives.



An Italian story.


Plenty of natural flair.














And the occasional oopsy.





The Marvel Universe is young, expanding and evolving. Like other things that have yet to cease existing it has a narrative that writes and rewrites itself. Birthdays around the (assumed) mid-point of life provides a certain prerogative to reflect on narratives and to *ahem* spend a bit of time thinking about the point (the reason and the inflection) when one’s narrative stops. 


But not that much time. For there’s plenty to do in the time left remaining.






Few collectors find it easy to disengage from their collections. The muddle of synaptic connections that makes an assortment of odds and sods morph into an ensemble of similar items with its own focus of attention (aka “a collection”) is one of many inexplicable, or, unknowable things. One of many inexplicable or unknowable things that frustrate grownups. Like whether Superman is Superman (in part) because of Lex Luther and how that paradigm shifts if Lex Luther turns out to be a stand up comedian (we may find out if DC goes the way of Marvel when it comes to the modern marketing of traditional supervillains). Or the finding that up to 4% of the human genome appears to be Neanderthal: like which distant relative of ours titillated “Hey, that looks vaguely human.. gonna have me a piece of that..” (or rather “hrrumph, hrrumph, hahw, hahw, hoomba..”) and that hybrid offspring of such a godless union can be genetically and reproductively viable. But the moment the idea creeps in that somewhere someone else has something better, or something you want, another something to add, it’s at that point that a collection develops a life of its own. It’s own story. A heartbeat. 



How many ways can you route derailleur cables around the bottom bracket?


Might as well.








The 1980 Invernizzi Competizione.




A middle aged man looks at a collection of old bicycles and contemplates a narrative that treads between serendipity from a life experienced and artifice from a (nostalgic) world imagined. A narrative that blurs between reality and make-believe. A world apart.

And quietly chuckles to himself.





Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Print Unable 32


Funny how things turn out the way they do. 

When I started running the hills around my area it was with the expressed purpose of slowing down my cadence and increasing my strength in preparation to ride a single speed bicycle off road. And it seemed to work before life became a bit busy. It’s been some time since I have ridden my single speed. Indeed, it’s been quite some time since I pushed down on anything resembling a bicycle pedal. Yet I continue to run. 

Print Unable 32. A flashing error message that mocks me. I turn the machine off then on again. The error message disappears. But only briefly. A couple of prints later and it returns. Laughing at a clumsy attempt to rectify the problem by simply wishing it away. I flick the switch a couple more times but this printer has an ability to learn. It will not allow such a simple trick to work again. This is a machine so complex that it knows itself. And it knows that I can’t possibly hope to understand its evil machinations.

Print Unable 32. I look it up on the internet. Because everything is on the internet. I go through the recommended sequence of steps and check the paper feed, and the drum unit, and the other printing whatnots. I turn the machine back on. Print Unable 32. I do the same sequence of steps another three times. I check a youtube video which shows how to block the toner sensor with a piece of tape. I open the printer but it’s a different model to that in the video. If there is such a sensor then it is hidden behind a plate clenched tight like an iron fist. I despair. Print Unable 32. The LCD display laughs at my feeble attempts to comprehend the incalculably complex.

Defeat. But it is easy to find the manufacturer’s service manual on the internet. It indicates that if cleaning the unit doesn’t work then one of three components needs replacing. To my delight, I find that I had purchased an extended warranty for the printer. I call the company the next day. They tell me to bring the printer in and they will replace it. 

Not fix it. Replace it.

This isn’t some $79 plastic printer. This is a $1200 plastic “multifunction centre”. According to the manufacturer’s service manual it just needs one (or all) of three parts replaced. Maybe the parts can’t be sourced any more. But it was a current model just a couple of years ago. Maybe the cost of labour in Australia is too prohibitive. I watch Kevin McCloud’s “Grand Designs” and see, with some disappointment, that it will cost me more to renovate my little wooden house in Brisbane than what it cost to resurrect a stone castle in Yorkshire. Not an igloo in Greenland or a yurt on the Mongolian highlands but a castle in England (and under the close supervision of archeologists from English Heritage paid for by the owner). Maybe after replacing parts and servicing costs and the printer still doesn’t work. What then? Well, whatever it is, the insurers have calculated that it is cheaper to replace the item rather than getting it fixed.

Machines have reached a degree of complexity and technological evanescence that the economics of globalisation and mass-production make them (relatively) cheap to manufacture but expensive (or impractical) to maintain. Australia places a high price for labour. Manufacturing that is mobile (building renovations isn’t one of them) moves overseas or kills itself at home. 

I read Heather Pringle’s article on the evolution of creativity in the Scientific American (March 2013). I learn that the oldest known stone tool was knapped by an australopithecine in Ethiopia some 2.6 million years ago. And that modern Homo sapiens emerged about 200,000 years ago. But nothing much happens for the first 100,000 years. Then archeologists find projectile weapons, insect repellent bedding, wind instruments, cave paintings, and figurative art dating between 90-60,000 years ago in Africa and 40,000 years ago in Europe (the difference presumably reflecting hominid migration). This suggests that the hand-held stone tool was, quite literally, the cutting edge of technology for at least the first 2.5 million years (assuming that archeologists took the time to dig just that bit deeper to make sure they didn’t miss anything in the African strata made by humans dating between 200,000-100,000 years ago). Any evidence of progress beyond the crude lithic reduction of rock dates from the most recent 100,000 years. Archeologist see an exponential growth of creativity. Anthropologists see an example of cultural ratcheting. 



Palp this piece of lithic reduction 



Over a couple of million years the hominid brain increased in size (Australopithecine had a mean capacity of 450 cubic cm; H. erectus 930 cubic cm; H. sapiens from 100,000 years ago 1,330 cubic cm) and specialisation (in areas that govern creativity where the free association of ideas then processes through analytic thought, and in areas that govern complex social behaviour such as language and empathy). The study by Dean et al outlined in the article shows that humans (with their big, specialised brain) also have a great ability to collaborate. Nursery school children, as opposed to chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys, can successfully tackle increasingly complex tasks by talking, encouraging and teaching each other. 

Ms Pringle reports that the modern human with his cognitive power, social skills, and capacity to collaborate had in place the essential elements for cultural racheting. But it was demography (specifically the establishment of large, connected populations) that spurred the leap in creativity seen over the past 100,000 years. The sharing and development of ideas as people interact is taken as an essential and potent driver of progress. A process that continues to ramp during the internet epoch of a super-connected world.

My mind pictures an unstoppable logarithmic curve of progress. And a human desire to have more of everything. It leaves me wondering whether such a thing is sustainable.

Print Unable 32. I contemplate the convenience and ridiculousness of having such a sophisticated multifunction centre in my little home office. 

I read Michael Marshall’s article in the New Scientist (No 2906, 2 March 2013). I learn that the global surface temperature has increased by 0.8˚C since the early 20th century and even if humanity stopped all emissions immediately the air temperature will still rise by another 0.3˚C. That means we are committed to at least a 1.1˚C rise. Mr Marshall reports that in 2007 the Arctic sea ice reached a new, less stable state. The question he puts forward is whether a further rise in temperature will reach other tipping points (the thawing of the Siberian permafrost is next in line) which could then lead to a cascade of global warming.



Not that simple



Variations in the Arctic sea ice, especially its recorded downward trend, is a reasonable cause of consternation. Indeed, for many it is the poster child of global warming. And global warming is not a good thing. Those that delve in the bafflingly complex study of the Earth's climate seem to agree that whilst the area (and volume) of Arctic sea ice has varied significantly over thousands of years it does appear to have become more unstable over the past few years. The study by Lenton and Levermann outlined in Mr Marshall’s article does not say that the melting of Arctic sea ice is itself a tipping point (Levermann states the situation is reversible) but proposes how this and some globally-significant tipping points (which they say aren’t reversible) can affect each other in ways not previously factored in climate models. 

Proposals for nonlinear catastrophic events justifiably draws criticism from the scientific community. Complex systems have homeostatic mechanisms to isolate threats and smooth out fluctuations. But the significance of the study is not whether you necessarily believe in tipping points that can cascade into each other as discussed in a recent article in the Scientific American. It presents the reasonable possibility that such cascades may actually exist. And that matters. Climate science is not exact: any particular event can lead to change that is not entirely predictable so any irreversible event becomes highly significant. And calamity does not reside solely at the extreme end of fuzzy forecasts. As outlined in another recent piece in The Economist, when it comes to global warming two things should continue to concern humanity: the degree of uncertainty and the fact that, in practice, not much has been done to mitigate it.

Print Unable 32. I wonder about my carbon footprint. And that of my neighbours. Elsewhere a mass of humanity heaves itself up to the comfort and convenience of the carbon-intensive lifestyle we take for granted.

I go for a run and plan out what I need to do. I remember I have to sort out some stuff at my mum’s place now that she is away visiting relatives. And there’s still some tax papers to scan and some renovation plans to sign off. Then I have to go to work. 

It’s going to be another busy day.

The replacement printer rumbles to life.